1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tax Credit Claim Reinstated: Procedural Lapses During GST Rollout Warrant Fresh Assessment and Fair Hearing</h1> HC allowed the writ petition challenging tax credit disallowance. Based on CBIC Circular No. 183/15/2022-GST, the court set aside previous orders and ... Disallowance of Input tax credit on supplies received from the supplier/dealer - mismatch in the GSTR – 3B filed by the petitioner and GSTR – 2A in respect of the input tax credit - HELD THAT:- The impugned orders in Exhibits P-4 and P-6 are set aside and the matter is remitted back to the assessing authority to consider the case of the petitioner afresh in the light of the Circular No. 183/15/2022-GST dated 27.12.2022. Petition allowed by way of remand. Issues involved: Disallowance of input tax credit due to mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A under CGST/SGST Act, 2017.The judgment dealt with the disallowance of input tax credit claimed by a registered dealer under the CGST/SGST Act, 2017, due to a mismatch between the GSTR-3B filed by the petitioner and GSTR-2A. The assessing authority disallowed the input tax credit based on this discrepancy. The petitioner had filed an appeal against this decision, which was dismissed. The petitioner argued that during the initial implementation of GST provisions, dealers faced challenges in understanding and filing returns correctly. The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs issued Circular No. 183/15/2022-GST, providing relaxation to dealers for the financial years 2017-18 and 2018-19 in cases where mismatches occurred due to supplier errors. The Circular outlined procedures to address discrepancies in ITC claimed in GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A. As the Tribunal was not constituted, the petitioner approached the High Court, seeking consideration of their case in light of the Circular. The Government Pleader did not contest that the petitioner's case fell within the scope of the Circular. The Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the impugned orders and remitting the matter back to the assessing authority to reevaluate the petitioner's case in accordance with Circular No. 183/15/2022-GST. The petitioner was granted a personal hearing before finalizing the fresh assessment on remand.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
