Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether excise duty recovered by the assessee from purchasers formed part of the sale price and was includible in taxable turnover, so that no referable question of law survived under Section 44(2) of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958.
Analysis: The statutory definitions of sale price and taxable turnover under the State Act were applied, and the Court noted that there was no indication excluding the duties in question from sale price. Section 64A of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 was held inapplicable because it operates only where tax or duty is imposed, increased, decreased, or remitted after the contract of sale. The question stood covered by earlier decisions holding that excise duty recovered by the seller from the purchaser forms part of the sale price, and the Supreme Court affirmation of the controlling precedent meant that the issue was no longer open for reference.
Conclusion: The Court held that excise duty recovered from purchasers formed part of the sale price and was includible in taxable turnover. No referable question of law survived, and the reference applications were rejected.