TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Confirms Services to Foreign Companies as Export, Exempting Them from Indian Service Tax.</h1> <h3>C.C.E. & S.T. -Vadodara-i Versus Bst Sayona Automations Pvt Ltd</h3> C.C.E. & S.T. -Vadodara-i Versus Bst Sayona Automations Pvt Ltd - TMI Issues involved:The issue in this case involves determining whether the services provided by the appellant to foreign companies for marketing and sales promotion, where the service receiver is located in India, are liable to service tax under the category of Business Auxiliary Service.Comprehensive details of the judgment:1. The appellant received an amount from Foreign Companies for services provided in India, leading to a show cause notice being issued by the department for service tax under Business Auxiliary Service. 2. The Revenue argued that since the service was provided and consumed in India, there was no export of service, making it taxable under Business Auxiliary Service. 3. The Respondent cited various judgments to support their claim that the services provided to foreign companies constitute an export of service. 4. The Adjudicating Authority held that the service provided by the appellant qualifies as an export of service, based on previous judgments, which was upheld by the Bombay High Court. 5. The Revenue's appeal against the judgment was based on the filing of an appeal before the Supreme Court, but it was found that the merit and facts of the case were directly applicable to the present case. 6. It was argued that the service was consumed by the foreign companies abroad, not in India, as the Indian customers purchasing goods from foreign companies were not the recipients of the services provided by the appellant. 7. The Tribunal supported the findings of the Adjudicating Authority, emphasizing that the service was consumed abroad by the foreign companies, and upheld the impugned order while dismissing the appeal filed by the revenue.This judgment highlights the importance of analyzing the location of service consumption and the recipient of services in determining the tax liability under Business Auxiliary Service for services provided to foreign companies. The Tribunal's decision was based on a thorough examination of relevant case laws and factual circumstances, ultimately affirming the export of service in this particular case.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
