2024 (1) TMI 773 - AT - Central Excise

Appellate Tribunal Overturns Duty Confirmation, Grants Cenvat Credit to Company, Nullifies Related Penalties.

M/s. Maa Lilori Ispat Private Limited, Mr. Sohrab Ali, Managing Director and Mr. Nasim Khan, Authorized Signatory Versus Commissioner of CGST & CX, Bolpur Commissionerate

M/s. Maa Lilori Ispat Private Limited, Mr. Sohrab Ali, Managing Director and Mr. Nasim Khan, Authorized Signatory Versus Commissioner of CGST & CX, Bolpur ... Issues involved:Three appeals filed against the impugned Order-in-Appeal upholding duty confirmation, penalty imposition, and recovery of Cenvat credit.Issue 1: Duty Confirmation and Penalty ImpositionThe Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the duty confirmation of Rs.3,57,030/- along with interest and imposed an equal amount of duty as penalty. Additionally, penalties of Rs.3,00,000/- each were imposed on the Managing Director and Authorized signatory of the Appellant company. Cenvat credit of Rs.4,159/- was ordered to be recovered along with interest and a penalty of Rs.2000/- was imposed under Rule 15(3) of the Cenvat Credit rules, 2004. The appeals were filed against this impugned order.Issue 2: Eligibility of Cenvat CreditThe main issue in the present appeals was whether the Appellant is eligible to avail the Cenvat credit based on the invoices issued by M/s Ganesh Forging Company. The investigation alleged that the supplier issued invoices without actual supply of goods, leading to the Appellant taking Cenvat Credit without actual receipt of goods. The Appellant contended that they received the materials, paid transportation charges, and service tax on the freight, making them entitled to the credit. Reference was made to a Tribunal decision where similar credit was held to be eligible. The Tribunal found that the Appellant provided evidence of payment for transportation and service tax, concluding that the Cenvat credit availed based on the invoices cannot be denied. Consequently, the impugned order denying the credit and imposing penalties was set aside, allowing all three appeals filed by the Appellants.This summary provides an overview of the issues involved in the legal judgment and details the comprehensive analysis and decision made by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA regarding duty confirmation, penalty imposition, and the eligibility of Cenvat credit based on the invoices issued by M/s Ganesh Forging Company.