Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the penalty imposed under Section 129 of the GST regime was liable to be interfered with when the goods were transported without a valid E-Way Bill.
Analysis: Possession of a valid E-Way Bill was treated as a mandatory requirement under Rule 138A of the GST Rules. The authorities found that the petitioner was not carrying a valid E-Way Bill at the time of interception and that the E-Way Bill produced later had been generated after the vehicle was intercepted. Those findings were not effectively challenged before the authorities or in the writ petition.
Conclusion: The penalty order was upheld and no interference was called for.