1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Transporter's Last-Minute E-Way Bill Fails to Overturn GST Penalty Under Section 129 Enforcement</h1> HC dismissed writ petition challenging GST penalty under Section 129 for goods transportation without valid E-Way Bill. Court upheld authorities' findings ... Penalty proceedings taken out under Section 129 of the GST Act - petitioner not in possession of a valid E-Way Bill while transporting the goods - HELD THAT:- The E-Way Bill is a mandatory requirement under Rule 138A of the GST Rules. Transporting the goods without possession in the absence of E-Way Bill constitutes a contravention of the provisions of the GST Act. The authorities have further found that the E-Way Bill which was later produced was infact generated after the interception of the vehicle by the revenue authority. The said E-Way Bill was rejected as it was found to be an attempt to post facto rationalize the illicit transportation of goods. The aforesaid findings have not been assailed before the initial authority in the show cause notice or in the memo of appeal or even in the writ petition. The writ petition (tax) is dismissed. The High Court of Allahabad dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner challenging a penalty imposed under Section 129 of the GST Act for transporting goods without a valid E-Way Bill. The authorities found that the E-Way Bill produced later was generated after interception of the vehicle and was considered an attempt to rationalize illicit transportation. The petition was dismissed as the findings were not challenged before the authorities.