Discriminatory tax amendment under composition scheme violates Article 14 and cannot stand.

Section 15(5)(e) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, as inserted by the Finance Act, 2007, was analysed as an additional levy on works-contract dealers under the composition scheme when purchases were made from unregistered dealers. The provision treated intra-State purchases differently from similar purchases from outside the State, creating unequal treatment between similarly situated assessees and undermining the object of encouraging purchases from registered dealers. On that basis, the amendment was held unsustainable and unconstitutional as violative of Article 14.

---

---

Issues: Whether Section 15(5)(e) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, inserted by the Finance Act, 2007, was unconstitutional as being discriminatory and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

Analysis: The assessees had opted for the composition scheme under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003. The amended provision required a dealer executing works contracts and opting for composition to pay tax on purchases from unregistered dealers under Section 3(2), in addition to composition tax. The resulting effect was that purchases made within the State attracted the additional levy, while similar purchases from outside the State did not. This created unequal treatment between similarly situated assessees and defeated the stated object of encouraging purchases from registered dealers. The Court held that the admitted discrimination made the amendment unsustainable.

Conclusion: Section 15(5)(e) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 was held to be unconstitutional and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

Final Conclusion: The assessees succeeded, and the State's challenge failed, resulting in invalidation of the impugned amendment and affirmation of relief to the writ petitioners.

Ratio Decidendi: A tax amendment that creates discriminatory treatment between similarly situated dealers under a composition scheme, without a constitutionally sustainable basis, offends Article 14 and cannot stand.

---