TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Capital gains cannot be taxed in wrong assessment year when actual asset transfer occurred earlier under section 45(3)</h1> <h3>DCIT-41 (4) (1), Mumbai Versus Abdulsattar Suleman Ghaswala And (Vice-Versa)</h3> DCIT-41 (4) (1), Mumbai Versus Abdulsattar Suleman Ghaswala And (Vice-Versa) - TMI Issues Involved:1. Deletion of addition of Rs. 13,96,40,040/- by CIT(A).2. Validity of reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer.Summary:Deletion of Addition of Rs. 13,96,40,040/- by CIT(A):The learned Assessing Officer challenged the deletion of Rs. 13,96,40,040/- by CIT(A), arguing that the assessee violated fundamental accounting principles by revaluing the land without proper routing through the profit and loss account or crediting the partners' capital accounts. The CIT(A) held that no capital gain accrued to the assessee in A.Y. 2013-14 on account of the revaluation of land, which was initially brought into the books of the firm in A.Y. 2011-12 at nil value. The CIT(A) relied on the Supreme Court decision in Sanjeev Woolen Mills vs. CIT and the ITAT Kolkata decision in ITO vs. M/s. Orchid Griha Nirman Pvt. Ltd. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, emphasizing that the year of transfer was A.Y. 2011-12, making the addition in A.Y. 2013-14 incorrect under Section 45(3) of the Act.Validity of Reassessment Proceedings:The assessee contested the reassessment proceedings, arguing that the Assessing Officer initiated them based on borrowed satisfaction without proper application of mind and failed to provide necessary approvals and reasons as required u/s 151 of the Act. The ITAT noted that the reassessment proceedings were initiated after it was found that the assessee introduced land into the partnership firm in A.Y. 2011-12, and the revaluation of this land in A.Y. 2013-14 led to a credit of Rs. 13,96,40,040/- in the assessee's account. However, the ITAT concluded that since the transfer took place in A.Y. 2011-12, any capital gain should be assessed in that year, not in A.Y. 2013-14, rendering the reassessment proceedings for A.Y. 2013-14 invalid.Conclusion:The appeal by the learned Assessing Officer was dismissed on merits, confirming the CIT(A)'s order, and the cross-objection by the assessee was dismissed as academic.Order pronounced in the open court on 21.12.2023.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
