TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Upholds Reassessment; Directs AO to Recompute Capital Gains Considering Section 54 Exemption Claim.</h1> <h3>Shri Himanshu Manoranjan Bhatt Versus Income Tax Officer Ward–22 (1) (5), Mumbai</h3> Shri Himanshu Manoranjan Bhatt Versus Income Tax Officer Ward–22 (1) (5), Mumbai - TMI Issues:The judgment involves issues related to reassessment proceedings under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the addition of long-term capital gains not offered for taxation in the return of income.Reassessment Proceedings under Section 147:The assessee challenged the impugned order dated 31/05/2023, passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The assessee had not disclosed the sale and purchase of immovable property in the original return of income filed physically. The AO initiated reassessment proceedings under section 147 based on information received from the ITD system. The Tribunal upheld the validity of the reassessment proceedings, stating that tangible material existed for the initiation of reassessment. Therefore, the reassessment proceedings under section 147 and the notice issued under section 148 were upheld, leading to the dismissal of ground no. 1 raised in the assessee's appeal.Addition of Long-term Capital Gains:The AO added long-term capital gains of Rs. 72,83,143 to the total income of the assessee as the gains were not declared in the original return of income or in the return filed in response to the notice under section 148. The Tribunal noted that the AO failed to grant the benefit of section 54 of the Act to the assessee while computing the capital gains. Despite the assessee's claim for exemption under section 54 in the revised return of income, the Revenue did not allow the exemption and added the capital gains to the total income. The Tribunal directed the AO to recompute the income under the head 'capital gains' after verifying the claim of exemption under section 54 of the Act. Grounds no. 2 and 3 raised in the assessee's appeal were allowed for statistical purposes, and the appeal was partly allowed.Separate Judgement:The judgment was pronounced by Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Judicial Member, and Shri Prashant Maharishi, Accountant Member, on 08/11/2023.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
