Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether payments made under the sponsorship agreement for non-exclusive use of event marks, footage, photographs and related sponsorship rights constituted royalty under the Income-tax Act, 1961 and Article 12 of the India-Singapore DTAA, so as to require deduction of tax at source.
Analysis: The sponsorship arrangement granted the assessee limited, non-exclusive rights to use and reproduce event marks, and to access footage and still images strictly for advertising and promotional purposes. The arrangement showed that the dominant object of the payment was sponsorship, publicity and brand promotion, while any use of trademarks, logos or similar material was only incidental to the commercial sponsorship package. Identical sponsorship clauses had earlier been considered in co-ordinate bench decisions, which held that such payments were not made for use of a trade mark or brand name in the royalty sense, and that the presence of proprietary marks alongside the sponsor's branding did not alter the essential character of the payment.
Conclusion: The payments did not constitute royalty under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 or Article 12(3) of the India-Singapore DTAA, and no tax deduction obligation arose on that basis.
Final Conclusion: The assessee's sponsorship remittances were held to be outside the royalty net, with consequential relief in respect of tax deducted at source.
Ratio Decidendi: Consideration paid for sponsorship-based advertising and promotional rights, where the use of event marks, footage or similar materials is limited, non-exclusive and incidental to brand promotion, is not royalty unless the payer is in substance obtaining a right to exploit a trade mark, brand name or comparable proprietary right.