GST Assessment Order Invalidated Due to Lack of Proper Notice, Petitioner Granted Opportunity to Respond and Seek Fresh Assessment HC found a violation of natural justice in the GST assessment order. The order was issued without proper notice after the petitioner's registration was ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
GST Assessment Order Invalidated Due to Lack of Proper Notice, Petitioner Granted Opportunity to Respond and Seek Fresh Assessment
HC found a violation of natural justice in the GST assessment order. The order was issued without proper notice after the petitioner's registration was cancelled. The court set aside the assessment order, remanded the matter to the assessing authority, and directed a fresh assessment with three days granted to the petitioner to file a reply to the show cause notice.
Issues involved: Violation of principles of natural justice in passing assessment order, Challenge to the validity of section 16(4) of the CGST/SGST Act, 2017
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking the quashing of Exhibit P5 order and P6 summary of order in Form GST DRC-07, alleging violation of natural justice and limitation. The petitioner also requested the invocation of powers under section 172 of the CGST/SGST Act, 2017 to address difficulties faced by taxable persons in availing input tax credit from belatedly filed returns and challenged the constitutionality of section 16(4) of the CGST/SGST Act, 2017.
The Court noted that the petitioner was issued a notice in Form GST ASMT-10 and a show cause notice under Section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017, without receiving physical copies, as they were uploaded on the GST portal. The petitioner's registration had been cancelled before the issuance of these notices, leading to the petitioner not filing a reply. The Court observed a lack of time granted for the petitioner to respond to the notices, indicating a violation of natural justice in passing the assessment order, Ext.P5.
The Court found merit in the petitioner's argument, highlighting that the notices were issued one after the other without affording the petitioner an opportunity to respond. Additionally, the petitioner's GST registration had been cancelled before the notices were uploaded on the portal, further supporting the violation of natural justice in the assessment process.
Consequently, the Court held that the impugned assessment order, Ext.P5, was unsustainable due to the violation of natural justice. The order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the assessing authority for a fresh order. The petitioner was granted three days to file a reply to the show cause notice dated 30.9.2023, and the assessing authority was directed to provide an opportunity for the petitioner before finalizing the fresh assessment. The petitioner was barred from raising any grounds regarding the limitation in finalizing the assessment for the relevant year.
In conclusion, the writ petition was disposed of with the above observations and directions, while any pending interlocutory application was dismissed.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.