Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether acetylene gas captively consumed within the factory for repair and maintenance of railway track, railway wagon, loco and other departments was eligible for exemption under Notification No. 65/95-CE or Notification No. 67/95-CE.
Analysis: The exemption under the notifications was examined in the context of captive use of acetylene gas inside the factory. The railway system within the plant was treated as an integral and inseparable part of production, since it was used for movement of inputs, intermediate products and dispatch of finished goods, and its operation was essential for the manufacturing process. The use of acetylene gas in the traffic department and in various shops and departments for repair and maintenance was therefore considered to be in relation to manufacture. The conclusion was supported by the principle that railway tracks within the plant form part of the manufacturing process when they are necessary for production and internal material movement.
Conclusion: The assessee was held entitled to the exemption, and the duty demand was held unsustainable.