TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Extension Granted: GST Appeal Allowed with 10% Deposit, Merits-Based Review Ensured for Appellant's Challenge</h1> <h3>Trans Car India Private Limited represented by its General Manager (Legal Affairs) Mr. Vijaya Raghavan “Buhari Buildings” Versus Additional Commissioner GST – Chennai South Commissionerate Office of the Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Additional Directorate DGGI</h3> Trans Car India Private Limited represented by its General Manager (Legal Affairs) Mr. Vijaya Raghavan “Buhari Buildings” Versus Additional Commissioner ... Issues involved: Appeal against order passed in writ petition challenging imposition of penalty and interest under CGST, SGST, and IGST Acts without jurisdiction.Issue 1: Challenge to order imposing penalty and interestThe appellant challenged Order-in-Original No.25 of 2023 (DGGI) dated 31.05.2023, alleging that the first respondent acted arbitrarily without considering their submissions during a virtual hearing. The order imposed penalty and interest under CGST, SGST, and IGST Acts without jurisdiction. The learned Judge in W.P.No. 27678 of 2023 disposed of the writ petition by granting the petitioner liberty to challenge the impugned order within thirty days and to deposit 10% of Rs. 14,88,370/- towards pre-deposit along with the proposed appeal.Issue 2: Extension of time limit for filing appealDuring the appeal hearing, the appellant's counsel requested an extension of the time limit granted by the learned Judge to file an appeal before the first respondent and to make the required pre-deposit. The court granted an extension of eight weeks from the current date for filing the appeal along with the pre-deposit. The first respondent was directed to consider the appeal without raising any limitation issues and to pass an appropriate order on merits and in accordance with the law after providing an opportunity of hearing to the appellant expeditiously.Conclusion:The High Court extended the time limit for filing the appeal and making the pre-deposit, directing the appellant to comply with the learned Judge's order within the extended period. The court disposed of the writ appeal with the given directions, without imposing any costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions were closed, and the Registry was instructed to return the original copy of the impugned order to the appellant after substituting it with a copy.
TaxTMI 