Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the excess pre-deposit made by the declarant in respect of one demand could be adjusted towards the amount payable under another demand while granting relief under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019.
Analysis: The Scheme did not provide for refund of excess deposit, but there was no specific prohibition against adjustment of an excess amount already deposited by the same declarant against a different pending demand relating to the same subject matter. The departmental circular clarified that deposits made at stages of enquiry, investigation, audit, or appellate proceedings could be deducted or adjusted while issuing the statement of amount payable. The Court also noted that the declarant had not sought refund, only adjustment, and that the Scheme was intended to resolve legacy disputes by giving effect to such deposits.
Conclusion: The excess amount deposited in relation to the first demand was liable to be adjusted against the liability arising from the second demand, and the challenge to such adjustment failed.