TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Revenue's appeal dismissed as seized documents alone insufficient for additions without linking evidence to assessee</h1> <h3>Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Surat Versus Jayantibhai Virjibhai Babariya</h3> Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Surat Versus Jayantibhai Virjibhai Babariya - [2023] 459 ITR 447 (Guj) Issues involved:The judgment involves the following Issues:1. Whether the addition of Rs. 41,67,45,000/- should be deleted based on incriminating documents found during search proceedings.2. Whether the incriminating documents, such as the 'Sauda Chithi,' should be considered as evidence in the case.3. Whether the assessee provided a satisfactory explanation for the 'Sauda Chithi' and the involvement of on money in the transaction.4. Whether the retraction of a statement by a witness should impact the decision-making process.5. Whether the Valuation Report by the Departmental Valuation Officer adequately considered all relevant evidence.6. Whether the opportunity for cross-examination was granted to the assessee.7. Whether the observation regarding the land transaction without a registered sale deed is valid.Judgment Details:The Tribunal allowed the appeal based on a previous judgment, leading to the Revenue's appeal. The High Court dismissed the appeals as they did not involve any substantial question of law. The Court referred to previous Supreme Court decisions to define what constitutes a substantial question of law. The Court emphasized that the right of appeal must adhere to the prescribed procedure and be based on substantial questions of law. The High Court cannot disturb findings of fact by the Tribunal unless a substantial question of law is involved. The Court highlighted the importance of formulating substantial questions of law for appeal. The judgment emphasized the need for a balanced approach in deciding appeals and the exceptions to interfering with lower courts' findings.Conclusion:The High Court dismissed the tax appeal as it did not involve any substantial question of law, based on the principles outlined in previous Supreme Court decisions. The Court reiterated the importance of adhering to the prescribed procedure and formulating substantial questions of law for appeals. The judgment highlighted the need for a balanced approach and exceptions to interfering with lower courts' findings.
TaxTMI 