We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic • Quick overview summary answering your query with references• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced • Includes everything in Basic • Detailed report covering: - Overview Summary - Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars] - Relevant Case Laws - Tariff / Classification / HSN - Expert views from TaxTMI - Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Trust wins appeal for Rs. 4.69 lakh corpus donation deduction under section 11(1) for Milan Mandir Building Fund ITAT Ahmedabad allowed the assessee trust's appeal regarding deduction under section 11(1). The trust received Rs. 4,69,603 as corpus donation for Milan ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Trust wins appeal for Rs. 4.69 lakh corpus donation deduction under section 11(1) for Milan Mandir Building Fund
ITAT Ahmedabad allowed the assessee trust's appeal regarding deduction under section 11(1). The trust received Rs. 4,69,603 as corpus donation for Milan Mandir Building Fund, which was properly credited to income and expenditure account and transferred to the specific fund. The donation was received for a specific purpose and invested in scheduled bank as per sections 11(1)(d) read with 11(5). CIT(A)'s denial based on signature concerns was unjustified. Both AO and CIT(A) were incorrect in disallowing the deduction.
Issues: 1. Delay in filing the appeal due to pandemic and demise of the Authorized Representative. 2. Disallowance of donation received by the Trust under Section 11(1) of the IT Act.
Issue 1: Delay in filing the appeal The appeal was filed against the order dated 01-09-2021 passed by National Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi for assessment year 2016-17. The grounds of appeal included a request to condone the delay in filing the appeal due to the global COVID-19 pandemic during the period 15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022. The Authorized Representative of the Trust handling the audit and income tax matters had passed away, leading to a lack of awareness about the order passed by the Hon'ble Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)- NFAC. The delay was explained as genuine and not willful, with a plea to condone it in the interest of justice. The Tribunal found the reasons for delay to be genuine and therefore condoned the delay of 550 days.
Issue 2: Disallowance of donation received by the Trust The assessee trust had e-filed its return of income for assessment year 2016-17, declaring total income at Rs. 1,27,541/-. The Assessing Officer observed that the trust had received interest income, Wadi rent income, and donations, showing a gross receipt of Rs. 23,12,660/ and applying Rs. 13,17,418/- for the trust's objectives. However, the Assessing Officer noted a difference amount of income of Rs. 20,73,572/- in respect of rent, donations in cash or kind, and income from other sources, which had not been declared. This resulted in the addition of the difference amount to the total income of the assessee. The CIT(A) confirmed this addition.
The appeal before the Tribunal focused on the disallowance of a specific donation received by the Trust of Rs 469613. The Trust had received this donation and credited it in the Income & Expenditure Account under "Donation in cash or kind," subsequently transferring it to the Milan Mandir Building Fund, as the donation was earmarked for this fund. The Trust argued that this was not a case of transferring funds to other accounts but a direct transfer to the specific fund for which the donation was received. The Trust had invested the donation in the Milan Mandir Building Fund as per the provisions of Section 11(1)(d) r.w.s. 11(5) in the Schedule Bank. The Tribunal noted that the donation was received for a specific purpose, invested accordingly, and therefore should not be included in the total income of the Trust as per the provisions of Section 11(1)(d). The Tribunal found the CIT(A) had not considered these aspects and allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer.
Conclusion: The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the genuine reasons for the delay in filing the appeal and the correct treatment of the donation received by the Trust for a specific purpose. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the addition made by the Assessing Officer, ruling in favor of the assessee Trust.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.