TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>GST registration cancellation set aside due to improper service and violation of natural justice principles</h1> Madras HC allowed petition challenging GST registration cancellation. Petitioner's GST registration was cancelled due to failure to file returns, caused ... Cancellation of GST registration of petitioner - failure to file returns - fault committed by the petitioner's Consultant - no notice was served to the petitioner by way of physical mode and was served only through e-Portal - violation of principles of natural justice - HELD THAT:- This Court posed a question as to whether the petitioner has been served with show cause notice and the impugned orders directly through physical mode or through e-Portal, the learned Additional Government Pleader fairly admitted that all the communications, viz., the show cause notice/notice affording opportunity of personal hearing and the impugned order were not served directly through the petitioner but were only uploaded in the GST Portal. Hence, the grievance of the petitioner that they have not been served with the show cause notice and only when they received property attachment notice, they came to know about the impugned orders appears to be genuine. Further, it is clear that the respondent knowing fully well that the petitioner's GST portal was closed owing to cancellation of GST registration on 08.02.2019, since, it the respondent, who made such cancellation, ought to have issued the show cause notice directly to the petitioner by physical mode of service and not through e-Portal, which was closed on 08.02.2019 itself - even assuming that the petitioner failed to respond to the show cause notice, it is the duty of the respondent to hear the petitioner before passing orders, which are prejudicial to the interests of the petitioner, instead, the respondent proceeded to pass the impugned orders by stating that the petitioner failed to file reply, nor appeared for hearing on 10.12.2021, and hence, the proposals contained in the show cause notice are confirmed, which is not fair on the part of the respondent. This Court is of the view that the impugned orders are in violation of principles of natural justice and liable to be set aside and one more opportunity has to be granted to the petitioner to put forth their contention - matters are remanded to the respondent for re- consideration - Petition allowed by way of remand. Issues:The challenge in both the Writ Petitions is to the orders passed by the respondent dated 15.12.2021 and to quash the same.Details of the Judgment:Issue 1: Non-filing of GST returns leading to cancellation of GST registration and subsequent orders:The petitioner, a registered dealer under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 2017, had their GST registration cancelled due to the failure of their Consultant to file returns without informing the petitioner. The respondent confirmed the demand made in the show cause notices without hearing the petitioner, which led to the petitioner being unaware of the proceedings until receiving a property attachment notice.Issue 2: Violation of principles of natural justice and mode of service:The petitioner argued that the respondent did not serve the show cause notice directly through physical mode after the cancellation of GST registration, which prevented the petitioner from being aware of the proceedings. The Court acknowledged that all communications were uploaded in the GST Portal, inaccessible to the petitioner due to the cancellation of registration, indicating a violation of natural justice principles.Judgment:The Court found the impugned orders to be in violation of natural justice and set them aside. The matters were remanded to the respondent for re-consideration, directing the respondent to grant the petitioner sufficient time to file a reply, fix a date for a personal hearing, and consider any documents provided by the petitioner. The Court emphasized the importance of providing the petitioner with an opportunity to present their case fully. Consequently, the property attachment notices and other consequential proceedings were also set aside.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
