TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
AI-powered research trained on the authentic TaxTMI database.
Launch AI Search →Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Supreme Court Overturns Lower Court Orders, Remands for Further Proceedings</h1> The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the orders of the lower courts and remanding the matter for further proceedings before the Collector ... Appeal to Collector (Appeals) - Appellate forum competence - Remand for fresh hearing - Enforcement of short levy under Section 11A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944Appeal to Collector (Appeals) - Appellate forum competence - Remand for fresh hearing - Validity of the Collector (Appeals) directing the appellant to approach the Tribunal against the Assistant Collector's order dated 20-3-1992 and the appropriate forum for hearing the appeal. - HELD THAT: - The Collector (Appeals) had directed the appellant to approach the Tribunal against the Assistant Collector's order of 20-3-1992, although that order was an adjudication by the Assistant Collector passed pursuant to directions of the Collector. The Supreme Court held that the appeal against the Assistant Collector's order lay before the Collector (Appeals) and that the Collector (Appeals) was incorrect in treating the Tribunal as the appellate forum. Consequentially, the Court set aside the impugned order of the Collector (Appeals) dated 31-3-1993 and also quashed the subsequent orders of the Tribunal and the High Court which flowed from that incorrect direction. The matter was remitted to the Collector (Appeals) with a direction to hear and decide the appeal against the Assistant Collector's order dated 20-3-1992 in accordance with law, giving the parties appropriate opportunity. [Paras 4]Impugned order of the Collector (Appeals) set aside; orders of the Tribunal and High Court set aside; matter remanded to the Collector (Appeals) to hear the appeal against the Assistant Collector's order dated 20-3-1992 according to law.Final Conclusion: Special leave granted; appeal allowed, impugned orders set aside and the matter remitted to the Collector (Appeals) for hearing and decision of the appeal against the Assistant Collector's order dated 20-3-1992 in accordance with law; no order as to costs. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the orders of the Collector (Appeals), Tribunal, and High Court, and remanded the matter to the Collector (Appeals) to hear the appeal against the order of the Assistant Collector dated 20-3-1992 according to law.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
