CESTAT allows CENVAT credit transfer of input services under Rule 10(2) despite Department's Rule 10(3) objections

CESTAT Mumbai allowed the appeal regarding recovery of CENVAT credit with interest and penalty. The Department sought recovery claiming erroneous availment due to non-compliance with Rule 10(3) of CCR, which requires verification of stock before credit transfer. The Tribunal held that Rule 10(3) applies only to inputs or capital goods, not input services. Rule 10(2) permits transfer of entire unutilized CENVAT credit to new business units. The Commissioner (Appeals) erred in restricting transfer to inputs/capital goods only. Supreme Court precedent confirms Rule 10 allows transfer of all available credits with inputs and capital goods. The Commissioner's order was set aside.

---

---

Issues involved:
The issue involves the recovery of CENVAT Credit of Rs.10,84,210/- under Rule 14(1)(ii) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, along with interest and penalty, challenged by the Appellant based on the transfer of credit from a proprietorship concern to a partnership firm.

Summary of Judgment:

Issue 1 - Compliance with Rule 10 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004:
The case involved the transfer of unutilized CENVAT Credit from a proprietorship concern to a partnership firm. The Department contended that Rule 10(3) regarding the transfer of stock of inputs or capital goods was not followed. However, the Adjudicating Authority found that the credit availed pertained only to input services, not inputs or capital goods, and ruled in favor of the Appellant. The Tribunal upheld this decision, noting that Rule 10 does not restrict the transfer of credits based on the quantum of inputs transferred, allowing for the transfer of entire available credits. The Tribunal cited previous judicial decisions supporting this interpretation.

Key Points:
- The Adjudicating Authority found that Rule 10(3) did not apply as the credit availed was on input services, not inputs or capital goods.
- The Tribunal affirmed that Rule 10 allows for the transfer of the entire available credits, not limited to the quantum of inputs transferred.
- Previous judicial decisions supported the interpretation that Rule 10 permits the transfer of all available credits.

Decision:
The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order of the Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise & GST (Appeals), Nagpur, with consequential relief, if any.

Conclusion:
The judgment clarified the application of Rule 10 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 in the context of transferring unutilized CENVAT Credit, emphasizing the permissibility of transferring all available credits without restriction based on the quantum of inputs transferred.

---