Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether internal combustion engines manufactured for fitting into forklift trucks were classifiable under Tariff Item 29(i) as engines designed for use as prime movers for transport vehicles, or under Tariff Item 29(ii) as other internal combustion engines.
Analysis: Tariff Item 29(i) applies to internal combustion engines designed for use as prime movers for transport vehicles and given some special shape, size or quality for that purpose, while Tariff Item 29(ii) covers all other internal combustion engines. Forklift trucks were held to be vehicles for transport, since they carry goods even if over limited distances and also perform stacking functions. On the facts, the engines manufactured for forklift trucks had special features adapted to their specific function of moving the trucks, and therefore answered the description in Item 29(i).
Conclusion: The engines were correctly classified under Tariff Item 29(i) and not under Tariff Item 29(ii); the classification challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Forklift trucks are transport vehicles, and an internal combustion engine specially adapted for use as their prime mover falls within the specific classification for such engines.