ITAT remands case for AO verification of gratuity fund payments under section 40A(7)(b) and CSR donation eligibility under section 80G

The ITAT Mumbai remanded the case to the AO for verification of facts regarding two deductions. For gratuity expenditure under section 36(1)(v) read with section 43B, the tribunal held that contributions to approved gratuity funds are allowable under section 40A(7)(b) but required AO verification of actual payment before the due date of filing returns and confirmation of payment to an approved fund. For section 80G deduction on CSR expenditure, the tribunal directed AO to verify whether donees held valid certificates and other donation details before allowing the deduction in accordance with law.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of Gratuity Expenses
2. Disallowance of Deduction under Section 80G for CSR Expenditure

Summary:

Disallowance of Gratuity Expenses:
The assessee contested the CIT(A)'s decision not to allow a deduction for Rs.83,69,981/- paid towards an approved gratuity fund, arguing that it was allowable under Section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee had made this claim in a revised return, which the AO rejected based on the Supreme Court's decision in Goetze (India) Ltd. Vs. CIT, stating that new claims must be made through a revised return. The CIT(A) also denied the claim, misinterpreting the provisions of Section 40A(7). The Tribunal noted that the claim should be allowable under Section 36(1)(v) r.w.s. Section 43B if verified that the payment was made before the due date for filing the return. The Tribunal remanded the matter back to the AO for verification of the payment to the approved gratuity fund.

Disallowance of Deduction under Section 80G for CSR Expenditure:
The assessee also challenged the CIT(A)'s disallowance of a deduction under Section 80G amounting to Rs.22,75,000/-, which was part of CSR expenditure. The CIT(A) had denied this claim based on Explanation-2 to Section 37(1), which states that CSR expenses are not deemed to be for business purposes. The Tribunal, however, cited various case laws to assert that while CSR expenses are not deductible as business expenses under Section 37(1), they can still qualify for deduction under Section 80G if they meet the criteria set out in that section. The Tribunal directed the AO to verify the facts, including whether the donees had valid certificates under Section 80G, and to allow the deduction if the conditions are met.

Conclusion:
The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with directions for the AO to verify specific facts and allow the claims as per the legal provisions.

---