Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether condensate emerging during processing of natural gas is liable to oil cess under section 15(1) of the Oil Industry (Development) Act, 1974.
Analysis: The Tribunal followed its earlier decisions in the respondent's own cases and held that section 15 of the Oil Industry (Development) Act, 1974 levies oil cess only on crude oil or natural gas. Condensate, as defined in rule 3(ac) of the Petroleum and Natural Gas Rules, 1954, is a separate hydrocarbon product obtained from natural gas processing and is not crude oil. The Tribunal also noted that if the legislature intended to tax condensate, it would have expressly included it in the charging provision. Since the demand had already been disallowed in earlier unshaken decisions, no reason was found to depart from that view.
Conclusion: Condensate is not liable to oil cess under section 15(1) of the Oil Industry (Development) Act, 1974. The Department's appeal was without merit and failed.
Final Conclusion: The demand of oil cess on condensate was not sustainable, and the appeal was dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Oil cess under section 15(1) of the Oil Industry (Development) Act, 1974 is leviable only on the goods expressly covered by the charging provision, and condensate emerging from natural gas processing does not fall within that levy absent specific statutory inclusion.