Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants' activity of converting materials supplied by customers into fully finished tooth brushes amounted to job-work so as to entitle them to exemption from duty under Notification No. 119/75-C.E. dated 30.04.1975 issued under Rule 8(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The work undertaken by the appellants consisted of manufacturing tooth brushes from materials and packing materials supplied by the customer and returning the finished goods to the customer. The Court applied the principles earlier laid down on the scope of job-work and held that the nature of the activity carried out by the appellants fell within that description. On that basis, the exemption notification was attracted.
Conclusion: The appellants were entitled to the benefit of the exemption notification and the appeals were allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where goods are manufactured from materials supplied by the customer and the activity answers the legal character of job-work, exemption granted for such work under the applicable central excise notification is available.