Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Rule 96(10)(b) Challenged: Constitutional Scrutiny of GST Regulation Sparks Legal Debate on Fairness and Procedural Equity</h1> <h3>RC INDUSTRIES Versus UNION OF INDIA</h3> RC INDUSTRIES Versus UNION OF INDIA - 2023 (78) G. S. T. L. 417 (Guj.) Issues involved: Challenge to the validity of Rule 96(10)(b) of Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017, and State Goods and Service Tax Rules 2017 as ultra vires and contrary to the Integrated Goods and Service Tax.Summary:Issue 1: Validity of Rule 96(10)(b) of GST RulesThe petitioner challenged the validity of Rule 96(10)(b) of Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017, and State Goods and Service Tax Rules 2017, as ultra vires and contrary to the Integrated Goods and Service Tax. The Coordinate Bench of the Court had issued notice in similar matters and granted interim relief in favor of other petitioners. The Court observed that the prayer in the petition was to declare the rule as ultra vires of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and to set aside proceedings initiated by the authority. The Court noted that other petitions challenging the same rule had been entertained, and interim relief was granted to those petitioners. In light of this, the petitioner was entitled to ad-interim relief, and the adjudication proceedings could continue without coercive recovery against the petitioner.Conclusion:The Court issued notice for the matter to be returnable on 21st June 2023. Adjudication proceedings were allowed to proceed, but no coercive recovery was permitted against the petitioner during this time.