Smartra Immobilisers classified under Chapter Heading 8708 9900 as vehicle accessories not automatic regulating instruments

CESTAT Bangalore held that Smartra Immobilisers should be classified under Chapter Heading 8708 9900 as vehicle accessories rather than under 8536 5090 as automatic regulating instruments. Following SC precedent in Westinghouse Saxby Farmer Ltd., the tribunal determined that since the immobiliser's sole and principal use is as an anti-theft security device for vehicles, it constitutes a motor vehicle part. The classification under 8708 was appropriate as there was no specific exclusion or alternative entry. Appeal allowed, impugned order set aside.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Classification of Smartra Immobilisers under Chapter Heading 8536 or 8708.
2. Applicability of HSN Explanatory Notes and relevant case laws.

Summary:

Issue 1: Classification of Smartra Immobilisers under Chapter Heading 8536 or 8708

The respondent, M/s. Bosch Limited, imported Smartra Immobilisers and classified them under Chapter Heading 8536 5090 as automatic regulating and controlling instruments. The original authority reclassified them under Chapter Heading 8708 9900 as vehicle accessories. The Commissioner (Appeals) reverted to the classification under 8536 5090, aligning with the Australian Customs Authority's classification. The department appealed against this order.

Issue 2: Applicability of HSN Explanatory Notes and relevant case laws

The Revenue argued that Smartra Immobilisers, being antitheft devices, should be classified under Chapter Heading 8708 9900, as they do not function as switches. The respondent contended that the devices are electronic chips that switch on the EMS upon receiving the correct signal, thus fitting under Chapter Heading 8536. They relied on HSN Explanatory Notes and several case laws to support their classification.

Judgment:

1. Technical Function and Classification:
The Tribunal noted no dispute on the technical aspects and function of the Smartra Immobiliser as an antitheft device. It emphasized that the device is used solely in vehicles for security purposes and does not fit the description of electrical apparatus under Chapter Heading 8536.

2. HSN Explanatory Notes:
The Tribunal referred to HSN Explanatory Notes, which state that Chapter Heading 8536 covers electrical apparatus for a voltage not exceeding 1000 volts, generally used for dwellings or industrial equipment. The Smartra Immobiliser, being a vehicle security device, does not fit this description.

3. Relevant Case Laws:
The Tribunal cited the Supreme Court judgments in C. EX, Delhi Versus Insulation Electrical (P) Ltd. and Westinghouse Saxby Farmer Ltd. Versus Commissioner of C. EX., Calcutta, which emphasized the principal use test for classification. The Tribunal concluded that the Smartra Immobiliser's principal use as a vehicle accessory for security purposes justifies its classification under Chapter Heading 8708.

4. Final Classification:
The Tribunal ruled that the Smartra Immobiliser is rightly classifiable under Chapter Heading 8708 as parts and accessories of motor vehicles, satisfying both conditions prescribed under HSN Explanatory Notes for this heading. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal concluded that the Smartra Immobiliser, being a security device used solely in vehicles, should be classified under Chapter Heading 8708 as parts and accessories of motor vehicles. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside.

---