GST Show Cause Notice Challenge Rejected: Statutory Alternative Remedy Directs Petitioner to Prescribed Legal Procedures

HC dismissed petitioner's writ challenging GST show cause notice. Court held that statutory alternative remedy exists for contesting the notice, and direct judicial intervention through writ petition is inappropriate. Petitioner was granted liberty to pursue alternative legal remedy as per prescribed procedures, emphasizing procedural requirements in tax dispute resolution.

---

---

Issues involved:
The judgment deals with the challenge against a show cause notice issued by Respondent No. 2 alleging GST liability on manufacturing and selling beer under specific brand names.

Details of the judgment:

1. Challenge against show cause notice:
The petitioner challenged the show cause notice dated 30.06.2022, contending that the activities of manufacturing and selling beer under specific brand names are not liable to GST. The petitioner argued that the amounts earned and retained by the Contractual Bottling Unit are not subject to GST, and it is UBL that should be responsible for GST as it provides services by granting representation rights. The petitioner sought to set aside the show cause notice on the grounds of arbitrariness and unreasonableness.

2. Legal position on writ petitions against show cause notices:
The petitioner cited legal precedents to support the maintainability of the writ petition against the show cause notice, emphasizing that when a notice is issued with premeditation, a writ petition can be entertained. However, the respondent opposed the petition, stating that there is an efficacious remedy available to contest the show cause notice before the adjudicating authority.

3. Court's decision and legal precedents:
The Court considered various grounds raised by the petitioner but ultimately dismissed the petition on the basis of the availability of an alternative statutory remedy. Referring to legal precedents, the Court highlighted that when a statutory appeal is provided, it should be availed by the litigating parties. The Court emphasized that entertaining a writ petition against a mere show cause notice is not appropriate when there is a statutory remedy in place.

4. Final decision and liberty to avail alternative remedy:
The Court allowed the application for dismissal of the petition and dismissed the petition on the grounds of an alternative statutory remedy being available. The petitioner was granted liberty to avail the alternative remedy in accordance with the law if advised to do so. No costs were awarded in the matter.

This judgment underscores the importance of exhausting statutory remedies before seeking judicial intervention against show cause notices, in line with established legal principles and precedents.

---