1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Supreme Court dismisses special leave petition, condones delay, and resolves all pending applications in related case.</h1> The SC dismissed the special leave petition following the dismissal of a related petition. The court condoned the delay and disposed of all pending ... Estimation of income - Bogus purchases - As decided by HC [2023 (1) TMI 835 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT] AO has chosen not to reject the books of accounts of the assessee and had made the estimated additions of the pieces of the purchases. Both, the CIT (Appeals) and the Tribunal, have concurrently and rightly held to make the additions, which the CIT (Appeals) had done @ 12.5% of the impugned purchases, which have been reduced and restricted to 6%. HELD THAT:- In view of the dismissal [2023 (12) TMI 144 - SC ORDER] following the said order, this special leave petition is also stand dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition due to the dismissal of another related petition. Delay was condoned and pending applications were disposed of. Citation: 2023 (12) TMI 228 - SC Order. Justices: B.V. Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan. Petitioner represented by N Venkatraman, Raj Bahadur Yadav, Alka Agarwal, H R Rao, and Udai Khanna.