ITAT rules non-resident payments not taxable as royalty when business activities conducted outside India under sections 9(1)(vi) and 9(1)(vii)

The ITAT Bangalore ruled in favor of the assessee regarding taxability of receipts as royalty. The Tribunal followed its earlier decision in Telefonica De Espana S.A and the Karnataka HC judgment in VSL case, holding that revenue authorities erred in determining income accrued in India. The Tribunal established that for non-residents, the situs of income source is where the non-resident conducts business activities, not where payments originate. Since the situs was outside India, the payments did not constitute taxable royalty or fees for technical services under sections 9(1)(vi) and 9(1)(vii).

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Taxability of receipts as "Royalty."
2. Taxability of receipts as Fees for Technical Services (FTS).
3. Taxability of receipts under Section 5(2) of the Income Tax Act.

Summary:

Issue 1: Taxability of Receipts as "Royalty"

The assessee, a foreign company providing international telecommunications services, received payments from Indian telecom operators. The Assessing Officer (AO) and Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) categorized these receipts as "Royalty" under Section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act and the India-UK Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). The assessee argued that these services do not involve the transfer of any rights in equipment or processes and are standard telecom services without active human intervention. The Tribunal, citing previous judgments and orders, held that the receipts do not qualify as "Royalty" under the Act or the DTAA. The Tribunal emphasized that the services provided do not grant the right to use any equipment or process and are not technical in nature.

Issue 2: Taxability of Receipts as Fees for Technical Services (FTS)

The AO alternatively categorized the receipts as FTS for certain assessment years. The assessee contended that the services provided do not qualify as managerial, technical, or consultancy services under Explanation 2 to Section 9(1)(vii) of the Act. The Tribunal agreed, stating that the services do not involve active human intervention or specialized skills and are standardized telecom services. Under the DTAA, the Tribunal noted that the services do not "make available" technical knowledge, experience, skill, or processes to the customers, thereby not qualifying as FTS.

Issue 3: Taxability of Receipts under Section 5(2) of the Act

The AO also argued that the receipts are taxable under Section 5(2) of the Act as income arising or accruing in India. The assessee countered that all services were rendered outside India, and hence, the income does not accrue in India. The Tribunal upheld this view, relying on judicial precedents that income accrues where the services are rendered. Since the assessee provided services from outside India without any presence in India, the income does not accrue or arise in India.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal concluded that the receipts from rendering telecommunication services are not taxable as "Royalty" or FTS under the Act or the DTAA. Consequently, the appeals filed by the assessee were partly allowed, and the grounds relating to the reopening of assessment were left open.

---