Modvat credit on endorsed gate passes protected where suppliers were exonerated and no collusion or unreasonable steps were shown.

Modvat credit could not be denied where the assessee bought inputs on endorsed gate passes showing an approved classification, the suppliers had been exonerated, and there was no collusion. The Court treated the assessee as having taken reasonable steps under the fourth proviso to Rule 57G(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, and held that later chemical analysis could not override the regular documents once the suppliers were not found to have wilfully misstated the goods. It further noted that allowing the Department's case would indirectly reopen the suppliers' classification, already certified by the jurisdictional authorities, in the same proceeding.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Department's application under Section 35H(i) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 gave rise to a substantial question of law on the denial of Modvat credit, where the assessee purchased the inputs on endorsed gate passes showing an approved classification and the suppliers had been exonerated.

Analysis: The Collector's own findings showed that the suppliers had not wilfully entered wrong particulars in the gate passes and that the assessee had received the very goods cleared under those documents. The Court held that, in such circumstances, the assessee could not be treated as having failed to take reasonable steps under the fourth proviso to Rule 57G(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The Department's reliance on later chemical analysis to treat the goods as unwrought aluminium could not justify denying credit once the suppliers stood exonerated and the purchases were made on regular, approved gate passes without collusion. The Court also held that permitting the Department's contention would indirectly allow the correctness of the suppliers' classification, already certified by the jurisdictional authorities, to be reopened in this proceeding.

Conclusion: No substantial question of law arose, and the assessee was entitled to retain the Modvat credit. The application was dismissed.

---