We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic • Quick overview summary answering your query with references• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced • Includes everything in Basic • Detailed report covering: - Overview Summary - Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars] - Relevant Case Laws - Tariff / Classification / HSN - Expert views from TaxTMI - Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Cooperative society wins appeal as tax deduction denial overturned due to prospective amendment application ITAT Bangalore set aside ex-parte appellate order by National Faceless Assessment Centre, finding violation of natural justice principles as assessee did ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Cooperative society wins appeal as tax deduction denial overturned due to prospective amendment application
ITAT Bangalore set aside ex-parte appellate order by National Faceless Assessment Centre, finding violation of natural justice principles as assessee did not receive notices and submitted documents were not considered. Regarding deduction under section 40(a)(ia) for interest paid by cooperative society to members, ITAT held Finance Act 2015 amendment was prospective from 01/06/2015 and not applicable to the case. Matter remitted to AO for fresh adjudication with proper hearing opportunity. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.
Issues Involved: 1. Non-receipt of notice by the assessee. 2. Ex-parte order passed without considering physical evidence. 3. Deduction of tax at source on payments made to members. 4. Violation of principles of natural justice. 5. Reliance on previous Tribunal decisions and CBDT Circulars.
Summary:
Non-receipt of notice by the assessee: The assessee argued that they did not receive any notice from the First Appellate Authority. The ex-parte order was passed without considering the evidences/materials furnished physically before the transfer of the matter to the National Faceless Assessment Centre. The assessee relied on a letter dated 15/05/2018 to the CIT(A) where all relevant documents were submitted and acknowledged.
Ex-parte order passed without considering physical evidence: The assessee's representative vehemently argued that the ex-parte order suffers from the violation of the principle of natural justice as the relevant documents were not considered. The appeal was disposed of without considering the documents which should have been reviewed on merit.
Deduction of tax at source on payments made to members: The issue of whether the assessee deducted tax at source on payments made to members was previously considered by the Tribunal in the assessee's own case for the assessment years 2010-11 and 2011-12. It was decided in favor of the assessee, relying on the order passed by different benches of ITAT. The Tribunal upheld that cooperative societies carrying on banking business need not deduct tax at source under section 194A(3)(v) of the Act when paying interest to members.
Violation of principles of natural justice: The Tribunal found that the impugned order was ex-parte and the documents furnished before the First Appellate Authority were not considered, which is a clear violation of the principle of natural justice. The Tribunal directed the AO to re-adjudicate the issue afresh upon consideration of the relevant evidences already placed by the assessee or any other evidences the appellant chooses to file.
Reliance on previous Tribunal decisions and CBDT Circulars: The Tribunal referred to previous decisions where it was held that cooperative societies carrying on banking business need not deduct tax at source on interest paid to members. The Tribunal also referred to CBDT Circular No. 9 of 2002, which clarified that a member of a cooperative bank shall receive interest on both time deposits and deposits other than time deposits without TDS under section 194A by virtue of the exemption granted vide clause (v) of sub-section (3) of the said section.
Conclusion: The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remitting the issue to the AO for fresh adjudication on merit and directing the AO to pass a speaking order considering the ratio laid down by different Benches. The Tribunal emphasized the need to follow the principles of natural justice and consider all relevant evidences.
Order Pronounced: The order was pronounced in the open court on 21st September, 2023.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.