TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tax Authority Must Resolve Registration Suspension Quickly, Ensure Fair Hearing and Procedural Compliance Under Section 29 of CGST Act</h1> <h3>Pushpendra Singh Versus Union Of India And 2 Others</h3> HC ruled on a CGST Act challenge, finding procedural irregularities in registration suspension. The court directed the tax authority to complete ... Suspension of registration of petitioner - no opinion recorded as stipulated under Rule 21A (2) of the CGST Rules, 2017 - principles of natural justice - HELD THAT:- As the petitioner has already submitted his reply to the show cause notice dated 12.10.2023, it would serve no purpose to keep the petition pending and therefore, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.3, Assistant Commissioner/Superintendent Range-34, Division Hapaur, Commissionerate Noida to complete the proceedings instituted through show cause notice dated 12.10.2023 within three weeks from today and till the proceedings under Section 29 of CGST Act, 2017 are completed by the respondent no.3, the suspension of the registration of the petitioner as noted in the order dated 12.10.2023 shall remain stayed. Petition disposed off. Issues involved: Challenge to show cause notice u/s 29 of CGST Act, 2017 and suspension of registration u/s 29(2) and Rule 21A(2) of the CGST Rules, 2017.Summary:The petitioner challenged a show cause notice dated 12.10.2023 issued by the Assistant Commissioner/Superintendent Range-34, Division Hapaur, Commissionerate Noida u/s 29 of the CGST Act, 2017. The respondent also suspended the petitioner's registration u/s 29(2) and Rule 21A(2) of the CGST Rules, 2017. The petitioner submitted a reply to the notice but complained of unnecessary delays in the proceedings, causing commercial loss. The counsel argued that the registration was suspended without recording an opinion as required by Rule 21A(2) of the CGST Rules, 2017.The High Court disposed of the petition directing the Assistant Commissioner/Superintendent to complete the proceedings within three weeks from the date of the order. The suspension of the petitioner's registration shall remain stayed until the proceedings u/s 29 of the CGST Act, 2017 are concluded.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
