TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tax Dispute Resolution: 20% Deposit Required Until BGST Tribunal Fully Constituted, Statutory Remedies Preserved</h1> <h3>M/s. Maa Durga Enterprises Versus Union of India and Others</h3> M/s. Maa Durga Enterprises Versus Union of India and Others - 2023 (78) G. S. T. L. 300 (Pat.) Issues involved: Non-constitution of the Tribunal preventing statutory remedy of appeal and stay of recovery of tax under the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act.Judgment Details:1. The petitioner sought relief for availing statutory remedy of appeal against an impugned order before the Appellate Tribunal under Section 112 of the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act (B.G.S.T. Act). 2. Due to the non-constitution of the Tribunal, the petitioner was deprived of the statutory remedy under Sub-Section (8) and Sub-Section (9) of Section 112 of the B.G.S.T. Act, which also prevented the petitioner from availing the benefit of stay of recovery of the balance amount of tax. 3. The respondent State authorities acknowledged the non-constitution of the Tribunal and issued a notification for removal of difficulties, stating that the period of limitation for preferring an appeal before the Tribunal shall start only after the Tribunal is constituted under Section 109 of the B.G.S.T. Act. 4. The Court ordered that upon depositing a sum equal to 20 percent of the remaining amount of tax in dispute, the petitioner must be granted the statutory benefit of stay under Sub-Section (9) of Section 112 of the B.G.S.T. Act, as the petitioner cannot be deprived of this benefit due to the non-constitution of the Tribunal. 5. The Court further directed that the petitioner must file an appeal under Section 112 of the B.G.S.T. Act once the Tribunal is constituted and functional, observing the statutory requirements for facilitating consideration of the appeal. 6. If the petitioner chooses not to avail the remedy of appeal within the specified period upon the constitution of the Tribunal, the respondent authorities are at liberty to proceed further in the matter in accordance with the law. 7. Compliance with the court's order, including payment of the required sum, would result in the release of any bank account attachment pursuant to the demand. 8. The writ petition was disposed of with the mentioned directions, observations, and liberty granted to the parties involved.
TaxTMI 