Revenue's appeal dismissed as additions under section 153A require incriminating material from search operations

ITAT Delhi dismissed Revenue's appeal regarding assessment under section 153A and addition under section 68. The tribunal held that additions under section 153A cannot be made without incriminating material gathered during search operations. The court emphasized that incriminating material must be recovered during search for each assessment year to frame assessment under section 153A. The decision was supported by multiple precedents including cases from Delhi HC and SC. The CIT(A)'s ruling that prohibited additions without incriminating material was upheld, confirming the legal requirement for concrete evidence from search operations before making assessments.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Legality of the CIT(A)'s order.
2. Quashing of the order under section 153A.
3. Addition under section 153A without incriminating material.
4. Deletion of addition on account of unexplained cash credit under section 68.
5. Deletion of addition on account of unexplained commission expenses.

Summary:

1. Legality of the CIT(A)'s Order:
The Revenue contested that the CIT(A)'s order was incorrect in law and on facts.

2. Quashing of the Order under Section 153A:
The CIT(A) quashed the assessment order under section 153A, which was challenged by the Revenue.

3. Addition under Section 153A Without Incriminating Material:
The CIT(A) held that additions under section 153A cannot be made without incriminating material gathered during the search. The CIT(A) noted that the assessment was not based on any incriminating document found during the search, and the assessment orders were quashed accordingly.

4. Deletion of Addition on Account of Unexplained Cash Credit under Section 68:
The CIT(A) deleted the addition of Rs. 1,50,00,000/- made by the AO on account of unexplained cash credit shown as share application money under section 68. The CIT(A) observed that no incriminating documents were found related to the assessee companies, and no addition could be made without providing an opportunity for cross-examination of the persons whose statements were relied upon by the AO.

5. Deletion of Addition on Account of Unexplained Commission Expenses:
The CIT(A) also deleted the addition of Rs. 1,12,500/- made by the AO on account of unexplained commission expenses under section 69C. The CIT(A) found that the facts were similar to those in another group case where similar additions were deleted.

Conclusion:
The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s findings, noting that the Revenue did not provide any material to counter the CIT(A)'s decision. The ITAT referenced multiple judicial precedents supporting the requirement of incriminating material for additions under section 153A. Consequently, the appeal of the Revenue was dismissed.

Order pronounced in the open court on 17th November, 2023.

---