TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Judicial Review Halts Tax Show Cause Notices, Grants Interim Stay Pending Comprehensive Response and Investigation</h1> <h3>M/s Shree Cement Limited Versus Union Of India, State Of Rajasthan, Commissioner, Central Goods And Service Tax Audit Commissionerate, Principal Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax, Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Jaipur, Commissioner, Central Goods And Service Tax, Joint Commissioner, Central Goods And Service Tax Audit Commissionerate, Additional Commissioner (Anti-Evasion), Central Goods And Service Tax, Joint Commissioner, Enforcement Ing, Circle-A, Kar, Joint/additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Service Tax, Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods And Service Tax, Assistant Commissioner And State Tax Officer- Ii, Joint Commissioner / Superintendent (Anti-Evasion), Central Goods And Service Tax Commissionerate, Ncr</h3> M/s Shree Cement Limited Versus Union Of India, State Of Rajasthan, Commissioner, Central Goods And Service Tax Audit Commissionerate, Principal ... Issues involved: Challenge to show cause notices u/s 73 and 74 of CGST/SGST Acts on grounds of simultaneous jurisdiction and violation of guidelines by officials.Summary:The High Court of Rajasthan entertained a writ petition challenging show cause notices issued by various authorities under Section 73 and 74 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act and Rajasthan Goods and Service Tax Act. The petitioner contended that the simultaneous issuance of notices by officials of CGST/SGST on the same subject matter violates Section 6(2)(b) of the Acts, which prohibits the Centre and State from exercising jurisdiction concurrently. Additionally, it was argued that the actions of the State GST Council officials in issuing a notice to the petitioner contravened the guidelines issued by the GST Council assigning taxpayers to specific authorities.The Court issued notices and directed representatives of Central GST and State GST to accept notice on behalf of the respondents. The writ petition was to be supplied to counsel for the respondents. A stay was ordered on passing any final orders in the proceedings initiated based on the show cause notices in question until the next hearing. However, the respondents were granted the liberty to apply for vacation of the interim order along with their reply.
TaxTMI 