Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to refund in cash of the duty/Cenvat credit relatable to raw materials and finished or semi-finished goods lying in stock at the time of de-bonding of the 100% EOU.
Analysis: The refund dispute turned on the eligibility of credit taken on inputs and goods covered by the de-bonding process. The department had subsequently dropped the show cause proceedings proposing recovery of the allegedly erroneous refund and had itself accepted that the credit availed on the relevant inputs and stock was allowable under Rule 3(1)(i), (vii) and (via) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. In view of that later adjudication, the challenge to the cash refund no longer survived for consideration.
Conclusion: The refund claim was held to be admissible and the impugned order was set aside in favour of the appellant.