TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court Reinstates GST Appeal, Mandates Comprehensive Review and Fair Hearing Under Bihar GST Act Section Provisions</h1> <h3>M/s Ganesh Kumar Versus State of Bihar and Others</h3> M/s Ganesh Kumar Versus State of Bihar and Others - 2023 (78) G. S. T. L. 85 (Pat.) Issues involved: Challenge to ex parte order of appellate authorityThe petitioner challenges the ex parte order of the appellate authority at Annexure-4. The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution despite the opportunity granted to produce supporting documents and the supplier not being issued a notice in the appeal. The High Court referred to the provisions of the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act, emphasizing the duty of the Appellate Authority to examine the grounds raised by the appellant and decide the issue on merits, even in ex parte situations. The Court set aside the order and directed the restoration of the appeal before the Appellate Authority.Details of the Judgment:In a previous case, Purushottam Stores vs. The State of Bihar & Ors, the Court highlighted the importance of the Appellate Authority's obligation to consider the grounds raised in the memorandum of appeal and decide on merits, as per the provisions of the Act. The Appellate Authority was reminded of its power to conduct further inquiries necessary to decide the appeal, with the decision based on the points raised. The High Court, therefore, emphasized the need for the Appellate Authority to not abdicate its powers and to ensure a thorough examination of the appeal.The Court directed the petitioner to appear before the Appellate Authority on a specified date, with instructions for the Authority to fix a hearing date and dispose of the appeal on merits within three months from the last hearing. Cooperation from the petitioner was mandated during the appeal hearing, and even in the absence of the appellant or their representative, the Appellate Authority was required to consider the appeal on merits and issue a speaking order. Ultimately, the writ petition was allowed with the above directions, ensuring a fair and comprehensive review of the appeal before the Appellate Authority.
TaxTMI 