Land sale cannot be treated as depreciable asset when no depreciation claimed in books

ITAT Kolkata allowed the assessee's appeal regarding computation of long term capital loss on sale of land. The CIT(A) incorrectly treated land as depreciable asset under section 50, despite the assessee never claiming depreciation on land in books of account. The tribunal found CIT(A) digressed from the actual issue of whether long term capital gain computation was correct versus assessee's claimed long term capital loss with indexation benefit. Documentary evidence confirmed no depreciation was charged on land. The tribunal set aside CIT(A)'s order and allowed the assessee's claim for long term capital loss computation.

---

---

Issues:
The appeal challenges the order of Ld. CIT(A) regarding the treatment of land as depreciable assets and the computation of long-term capital gain on the sale of land.

Issue 1: Treatment of Land as Depreciable Assets

The assessee contested the Ld. CIT(A)'s decision to treat the land as depreciable assets and to classify the gain/loss from the sale of the land as short-term capital gain/loss. The appellant argued that no depreciation was claimed or allowed on the land, as evidenced by the audited accounts and income tax records. The appellant further contended that the order relied on irrelevant judgments not applicable to the case. The Ld. CIT(A) directed the Assessing Officer to treat the capital gain as short-term capital gain under Section 50 of the Income Tax Act.

Issue 2: Computation of Long-Term Capital Gain

The primary issue in this appeal pertains to the computation of long-term capital gain on the sale of land. The assessee reported a long-term capital loss, which was recalculated by the Ld. AO as long-term capital gain. The appellant provided detailed facts regarding the sale of land, including agreements and financial statements. The Ld. AO's method of computation was challenged, particularly concerning the index cost of acquisition and deductions from sales proceeds. The Ld. CIT(A) upheld the assessment, directing the capital gain to be treated as short-term capital gain under Section 50 of the Act.

Conclusion:

Upon review, the Appellate Tribunal set aside the Ld. CIT(A)'s order, emphasizing that the land was not a depreciable asset and had never been treated as such by the assessee. The Tribunal found that the Ld. CIT(A) had deviated from the core issue raised by the assessee and made an unwarranted decision. The Tribunal accepted the computation of long-term capital loss provided by the appellant, supported by documentary evidence. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appellant's grounds, and the appeal was granted in favor of the assessee.

This summary provides a detailed overview of the issues raised in the legal judgment, including the treatment of land as depreciable assets and the computation of long-term capital gain on the sale of land.

---