Tribunal Grants Exemption for Cables Supplied to Institutions, Overturning Previous Denial; Valid Certification Key.

The Tribunal allowed the appeal by M/s Cable Corporation of India Ltd, setting aside the impugned order that denied exemption under notification no. 10/1997-CE for 'cables' supplied to specified institutions. The Tribunal determined that the exemption was valid because the supplies were made against certification by the competent authority, confirming specific end-use as required under the notification. The Tribunal referenced its previous decision involving the appellant, affirming that the exemption could not be denied. Other issues, such as limitations, were not addressed as the eligibility for exemption was established.

---

---

Issues involved: Denial of exemption under notification no. 10/1997-CE dated 1st March 1997 on 'cables' supplied to specific institutions despite certification.

Summary:

The appeal by M/s Cable Corporation of India Ltd was against the recovery of duty liability, interest, and penalty under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The main issue was the correctness of denial of exemption under notification no. 10/1997-CE on 'cables' supplied to certain institutions between September 2010 and August 2011, despite certification as required by the notification.

The appellant contended that the supplies made to the specified institutions were eligible for exemption under the impugned notification, as they were made against certification. The appellant argued that the issue was covered by a previous decision of the Tribunal in their own dispute.

The denial of the exemption was based on the finding that the supplied 'cables' were not considered 'scientific or technical instruments', 'apparatus', or 'parts or consumables' as required by the notification. The end-use by the eligible institutions and the validity of the certification were not disputed. The Tribunal, in a previous case involving the appellant, had held that when a certificate was issued by the competent authority regarding the specific end-use of goods as required under the notification, the exemption cannot be denied.

Given that the issue was already settled by previous Tribunal decisions, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed. The Tribunal found that the appellants were eligible for the exemption claim under the relevant notifications based on the certificates issued by the competent authority. Other issues like limitations were not addressed as the eligibility for exemption was established.

(Order pronounced in the open court on 11/10/2023)

---