Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether proceedings for detention and penalty under GST could be sustained when the corrected tax invoice and e-way bill were produced before the detention or seizure order was passed.
Analysis: The goods were intercepted on the ground of mismatch in the accompanying documents, but the corrected invoice and e-way bill were produced before any detention or seizure order was passed. The authorities did not dispute that the discrepancy had been cured at that stage. The Court followed the earlier Division Bench view that once the proper documents are produced before the detention or seizure order, continuation of the proceedings is not justified.
Conclusion: The impugned orders were unsustainable and were set aside. The matter was remanded to the first appellate authority for fresh decision in accordance with law.