TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>ITAT upholds AO's acceptance of demonetization cash deposits explanation, quashes CIT's Section 263 revision order</h1> <h3>Gudia Singhania Versus PCIT, Ranchi</h3> Gudia Singhania Versus PCIT, Ranchi - TMI Issues:The judgment involves the issue of jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and the validity of the revisionary order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax- Ranchi.Details of the Judgment:Issue 1: Invalid Jurisdiction u/s 263 of the ActThe appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax- Ranchi passed under section 263 of the Act for the assessment year 2017-18. The Principal Commissioner observed abnormal increase in cash deposits during demonetization period and raised concerns about lack of verification by the Assessing Officer (AO). The assessee explained the increase in sales during the relevant period due to festive season and prohibition on certain items. The Assessing Officer had conducted necessary verification and accepted the explanations provided by the assessee. The Tribunal noted that the conditions for invoking jurisdiction under section 263 were not fulfilled as the assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the interest of revenue. The Tribunal quashed the revisionary order, citing the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and Delhi High Court.Conclusion:The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, emphasizing that the revisionary order passed under section 263 of the Act was quashed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
