2023 (11) TMI 329 - AT - Income Tax

Foreign company wins rectification case as income reduced to Rs. 2.71 crore after revised TDS filings under section 154

Schench Process Europe GambH Versus DCIT, CPC, Bangalore

Schench Process Europe GambH Versus DCIT, CPC, Bangalore - TMI Issues involved: The appeal concerns the correctness of the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) under section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, against the order of assessment passed by the Assessing Officer. The main issue is whether the Assessing Officer was justified in not reducing the income of the assessee in line with the reduction of TDS credit as per the revised Form No. 26AS.Summary of Judgment:Issue 1: Correctness of CIT(A)'s Decision on Reduction of Income and TDS CreditThe assessee contended that the correct income should be assessed at a lower figure of Rs. 2,90,10,368/- and TDS credit at Rs. 29,78,210/- due to errors in the original TDS returns of the deductors. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) rejected this plea, stating that adjustments based on Form 26AS could only be made for additions to income, not reductions. The Tribunal disagreed, noting that the provisions of section 154 of the Act allow for rectification of errors that reduce the liability of the assessee. Citing legal precedents, the Tribunal emphasized that assessed income could legitimately fall below the returned income in genuine cases. Therefore, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to determine the income as claimed by the assessee and grant the appropriate TDS credit.Key Points:- The assessee's income and TDS credit were originally based on Form 26AS, which was later revised due to errors in the deductors' TDS returns.- The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) refused to reduce the income of the assessee in line with the revised TDS credit, citing limitations under section 143(1) of the Act.- The Tribunal held that the provisions of section 154 allow for rectification of errors that reduce the assessee's liability, contrary to the CIT(A)'s decision.- Legal precedents were cited to support the Tribunal's decision that assessed income can be lower than the returned income in appropriate circumstances.- The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to determine the income at the revised figure of Rs. 2,90,10,368/- and grant TDS credit accordingly, in favor of the assessee. This judgment highlights the importance of rectifying errors that reduce the liability of the assessee, even if it results in the assessed income being lower than the returned income. The Tribunal's decision serves to ensure fairness and prevent unjust enrichment of the revenue authorities.