Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the confirmation of duty demand by denying exemption under the EPCG notification could be sustained when the assessee claimed fulfilment of export obligation and the adverse DGFT communication was not furnished for rebuttal.
Analysis: The exemption claim turned on fulfilment of export obligation under the EPCG scheme and the notification governing the import of capital goods. The record showed that the assessee had applied for discharge/redemption and had produced a chartered accountant's certificate supporting fulfilment. The adverse communication relied upon by the lower authority was not disclosed to the assessee for explanation or rebuttal. The material before the Tribunal also indicated that the application submitted to the DGFT contained the relevant enclosures, and there was no contemporaneous intimation of deficiencies. In these circumstances, the Tribunal held that the adjudicating authority should have assessed the available material pragmatically, considered secondary evidence where primary evidence was unavailable, and complied with natural justice before confirming the demand.
Conclusion: The confirmation of demand was not sustainable. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was sent back for the lower authority to await the DGFT certificate.