Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether input tax credit could be denied merely on the basis of mismatch between GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B, and whether the assessment and recovery orders were liable to be set aside to afford the assessee an opportunity to substantiate its claim.
Analysis: The denial of input tax credit was founded on mismatch between GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B under Section 73 of the State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The assessee asserted that it possessed valid invoices and that the tax collected by the supplier was reflected in GSTR-2A, though with delay. In the circumstances, the claim was not treated as conclusively untenable, and the assessee was found entitled to place supporting documents before the assessing authority for verification.
Conclusion: The denial of input tax credit on the existing material was not sustained. The assessment order and recovery notice were set aside, and the assessee was given an opportunity to establish the claim before the assessing authority.
Final Conclusion: The assessee obtained relief by setting aside the impugned assessment and recovery measures, with the matter left open for reconsideration on production and examination of documents.
Ratio Decidendi: Input tax credit should not be denied solely on a GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B mismatch where the assessee is afforded an opportunity to establish the claim through supporting evidence.