Wireless Access Points with MIMO technology qualify for customs duty exemption under notification Serial No. 13

CESTAT New Delhi held that Wireless Access Points (WAP) with MIMO technology are classifiable under CTI 8517 62 90 and eligible for customs duty exemption under Serial No. 13 of notification dated 01.03.2005 as amended. The Tribunal ruled that exclusion clause (iv) applies only to products having both MIMO and LTE technologies, not products with MIMO alone. Since the imported WAP used MIMO technology but did not support LTE standard, the exemption was properly granted. The Department's appeals were dismissed, confirming the importer's entitlement to duty exemption for the period July 2014 to June 2017.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Classification of Wireless Access Points (WAP) under Customs Tariff Item (CTI) 8517 62 90.
2. Availability of exemption from Basic Customs Duty (BCD) under the notification dated 01.03.2005, as amended by the notification dated 11.07.2014.
3. Interpretation of exclusion clause (iv) in Serial No. 13 of the notification.
4. Invocation of the extended period of limitation under section 28(4) of the Customs Act, 1962.
5. Imposition of penalties under sections 112, 114AA of the Customs Act.

Summary:

1. Classification of WAP:
Beetal Teletech Limited imported Wireless Access Points (WAP) and classified them under CTI 8517 62 90, claiming they work on MIMO technology but do not support LTE standard. The Additional Director General (Adjudication) ruled in favor of Beetal Teletech, classifying WAP under CTI 8517 62 90 and granting exemption from BCD.

2. Exemption from BCD:
The exemption under Serial No. 13 of the notification dated 01.03.2005, as amended by the notification dated 11.07.2014, was claimed. The relevant entry exempts all goods under heading 8517 except specified items, including "Multiple Input/Multiple Output (MIMO) and Long Term Evolution (LTE) Products." The Department issued a show cause notice proposing to deny the exemption, arguing the exclusion applies to both MIMO and LTE products separately.

3. Interpretation of Exclusion Clause (iv):
The core issue was whether the exclusion clause covers products having only MIMO technology and not LTE standard. The Department contended 'and' should be read as 'or', covering MIMO and LTE products separately. Beetal Teletech argued 'and' should be interpreted conjunctively, covering only products having both MIMO and LTE. The Tribunal accepted Beetal Teletech's interpretation, emphasizing that 'and' is conjunctive and the exclusion clause applies only to products with both MIMO and LTE.

4. Extended Period of Limitation:
The show cause notice invoked the extended period of limitation under section 28(4) of the Customs Act, 1962. However, the Tribunal found no willful suppression of information by Beetal Teletech, as the presence of MIMO technology was evident in all Bills of Entry.

5. Imposition of Penalties:
The proposals for confiscation and penalties under sections 112, 114AA of the Customs Act were dropped by the Additional Director, as Beetal Teletech satisfactorily discharged the onus for its claim and no willful suppression was found.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal upheld the order dated 28.11.2019, granting exemption from the whole of the customs duty to Beetal Teletech for WAP classified under CTI 8517 62 90. The appeals filed by the Department were dismissed, affirming that the exclusion clause (iv) applies only to products having both MIMO and LTE. The Tribunal did not find it necessary to address other contentions, including the invocation of the extended period of limitation.

---