HC denies bail in Teachers Recruitment Scam money laundering case despite questioning ED's Section 19 PMLA powers

HC dismissed bail application in Teachers Recruitment Scam money laundering case. Court initially questioned Enforcement Directorate's policy regarding Section 19 PMLA powers, finding no cogent reasons for their exercise. However, ED argued scam involves wide magnitude with recently surfaced materials showing petitioner's glaring involvement in money trail. Court noted Division Bench's tentative investigation timeline and ED's request to examine additional witnesses regarding donations to school account. Given scam's ramifications, investigating agency granted opportunity to exhaust investigation powers. Bail denied.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Allegations of money laundering under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA).
2. Petitioner's involvement in the Teachers' Recruitment Scam.
3. Bail application and its rejection by the learned Special Court.

Summary:

Allegations of Money Laundering:
The petitioner is implicated in connection with M.L. case no. 13 of 2022 arising out of ECIR No. KLZOII/19/2022 for alleged commission of offences under Sections 3 and 70 of the PMLA, 2002 and punishable under Section 4 of the same Act. The accusations involve the petitioner's active involvement in assisting his father, the president of the West Bengal Board of Primary Education, in laundering proceeds of crime acquired through corrupt activities. This included extorting money from self-financed D.El.Ed Colleges and students during the COVID-19 pandemic, using proprietary concerns M/s Acuere Consultancy Services and M/s Educlasses Online to launder the extorted funds.

Petitioner's Involvement in the Teachers' Recruitment Scam:
The petitioner, along with his father, formed proprietary concerns to launder the extorted money. Investigations revealed that no actual services were provided by these firms, and the funds were not returned. The petitioner also opened joint bank accounts with family members to further conceal the proceeds of crime. The Enforcement Directorate (E.D.) highlighted the petitioner's complicity in the money trail and his role as the final beneficiary of the laundered funds.

Bail Application and Its Rejection:
The petitioner appeared before the Special Court and prayed for bail, but the E.D. opposed this, citing the petitioner's complicity and the ongoing investigation. The Special Court rejected the bail application on 22nd February 2023. A revisional application challenging this order was filed but subsequently not pressed by the petitioner. Another application under Section 88 of the Cr.P.C. was also rejected by the Special Court on 22nd March 2023.

The petitioner's counsel argued for bail based on the period of detention, the petitioner's cooperation with the investigation, and the fact that he was never arrested under Section 19 of the PMLA. However, the E.D. emphasized the petitioner's involvement in economic offences and the necessity of continued investigation. The High Court noted the ongoing investigation and the recent surfacing of new materials, leading to the decision to deny bail at this stage.

Conclusion:
The High Court dismissed the bail application, emphasizing the need for the E.D. to complete its investigation, especially given the wide ramifications of the Teachers' Recruitment Scam. The court directed all parties to act on the server copy of the judgment and allowed for urgent certified copies to be supplied upon compliance with formalities.

---