Unexplained loan addition under Section 68 deleted as transaction through banking channels with proper documentation deemed genuine

ITAT Surat upheld CIT(A)'s deletion of addition u/s 68 for unexplained loan. Assessee received loan from deceased lender through banking channels with proper documentation including confirmation, bank statements, and death certificate. Following Gujarat HC precedent in Patel Ramniklal Hirji case, loan transaction was deemed genuine as it was through account payee cheques with supporting documents. ITAT also upheld deletion of agricultural income addition, noting assessee's agricultural income was previously accepted by department and Rs. 26,28,436 from 30 acres with 900 chickoo and 400 mango trees was reasonable. Revenue's appeal dismissed.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Deletion of addition of Rs. 1,00,00,000/- made under section 68 of the Income Tax Act on account of unexplained cash credit.
2. Deletion of addition of Rs. 16,02,000/- made on account of agricultural income.

Summary:

Issue 1: Deletion of Addition of Rs. 1,00,00,000/- under Section 68

The Revenue challenged the deletion of an addition of Rs. 1,00,00,000/- made by the Assessing Officer (AO) under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, claiming it was an unexplained cash credit. The AO had issued a show cause notice to the assessee, questioning the genuineness and creditworthiness of a loan received from Mr. Ishwarbhai D. Patel. The AO treated the amount as cash credit under section 68 due to insufficient evidence provided by the assessee. The CIT(A) deleted the addition, noting that the assessee had repaid the loan and submitted necessary documents such as the PAN number, confirmation from the creditor, and bank statements. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, emphasizing that the documents justified the identity, genuineness, and creditworthiness of the loan giver. The Tribunal cited several judgments, including CIT-I v. Patel Ramniklal Hirji and PCIT v. D & H Enterprises, to support its decision.

Issue 2: Deletion of Addition of Rs. 16,02,000/- on Account of Agricultural Income

The Revenue also contested the deletion of an addition of Rs. 16,02,000/- made by the AO, who had treated part of the assessee's agricultural income as unexplained cash credit. The AO had rejected the sale bills provided by the assessee, questioning their authenticity. The CIT(A) deleted the addition, noting that the assessee had consistently shown agricultural income in previous years and provided sufficient evidence, including land records and 7/12 extracts. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, stating that the agricultural income claimed was reasonable given the assessee's land holdings and historical income records.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT(A)'s deletion of the additions under both issues. The order was pronounced on 16/10/2023.

---