Petition Granted: Refund Claim Approved with Interest, Overturns Prior Rejection Due to Clear Evidence and Timely Submission.

The HC allowed the petition, overturning the Appellate Authority's decision. It directed the respondents to process the petitioner's refund claim, including applicable interest, within two weeks. The court found the rejection unsustainable as the petitioner had submitted sufficient documentary evidence, and the relevant date for limitation was clear from the shipping bills and invoices. The petition was disposed of accordingly.

---

---

Issues involved:
The petitioner's appeal against the rejection of refund order dated 31.05.2021 was rejected, specifically regarding the refund application for the period 01.06.2018 to 31.03.2019 under Section 54(1) of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017.

Issue 1: Refund rejection for the period 01.06.2018 to 31.03.2019:
The petitioner sought a refund of Input Tax Credit amounting to Rs. 13,71,484/-, with a breakup for two periods. While the refund for the period 01.04.2019 to 31.03.2020 was allowed, the refund for the period 01.06.2018 to 31.03.2019 was rejected due to filing beyond the stipulated period u/s 54(1) of the CGST Act.

Issue 2: Appellate Authority's decision and grounds for rejection:
The Appellate Authority accepted that the application was not time-barred due to a specific notification, but rejected the appeal citing lack of documentary evidence on the mode of export, which was necessary to ascertain the commencement date for calculating the limitation period under Section 54(1) of the CGST Act.

Judgment Details:
The High Court found the impugned order unsustainable for multiple reasons. Firstly, the Adjudicating Authority did not raise any issue regarding document submission by the petitioner, and had partly allowed a previous refund application. Secondly, the petitioner had provided a detailed tabular statement and email with necessary details, which were not disputed. The relevant date for the limitation period calculation was clear from the shipping bills and invoices submitted by the petitioner.

Conclusion:
The High Court allowed the petition, directing the respondents to process the petitioner's refund claim with applicable interest within two weeks. The petition was disposed of accordingly.

---