Appeal Partly Allowed: Section 80IC Deduction Permitted Despite Late Filing; Interest Income Ruling Clarified.

The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the AO to permit the appellant's claim under Section 80IC. It ruled that the interest income from eligible business should not be deducted from the gross total income, except for the interest on an insurance claim. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the deduction under Section 80IC despite the late filing of the return, citing a sufficient cause for the delay. The issues regarding the legality of the CIT(A)'s order and the violation of natural justice were addressed within the broader context of these findings.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Legality of the CIT(A)'s order.
2. Addition of interest income under Section 80IC.
3. Disallowance of deduction claimed under Section 80IC due to late filing of income tax return.
4. Violation of principles of natural justice.

Summary:

Issue 1: Legality of the CIT(A)'s Order
The appellant argued that the order passed by the CIT(A) is bad both in law and on facts. However, this ground was deemed general in nature and did not require specific adjudication.

Issue 2: Addition of Interest Income under Section 80IC
The appellant contended that the CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition of interest income of Rs. 7,01,825/- derived from eligible business, which should not be deducted from gross total income while computing the relief admissible under Section 80IC. The Tribunal, referencing the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Madras in CIT vs. Seshasayee Paper & Board Ltd., held that the interest received on deposits kept with entities like the electricity board and environment board is derived from eligible business. Thus, this interest should not be deducted from gross total income. However, the interest of Rs. 54,680/- received on an insurance claim was not considered derived from eligible business and should be reduced. Consequently, ground no. 2 was partly allowed.

Issue 3: Disallowance of Deduction under Section 80IC due to Late Filing
The appellant challenged the disallowance of Rs. 2,00,10,879/- under Section 80IC due to the late filing of the income tax return. The appellant argued that the audit report was filed within the due date, and the delay was due to the critical illness of an executive partner. The Tribunal, referencing the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in CIT vs. GM Knitting Industries Pvt. Ltd., held that while making a claim for deduction is mandatory, the timing is directory. Therefore, even if the claim is made during the assessment proceedings, it should be allowed. The Tribunal concluded that the appellant is entitled to the deduction under Section 80IC, despite the late filing of the return, as the delay was due to sufficient cause. Thus, grounds no. 3 and 4 were allowed.

Issue 4: Violation of Principles of Natural Justice
The appellant argued that the CIT(A) erred in not deleting the addition made by the AO, which was unlawful and violated principles of natural justice. This issue was addressed within the context of the above discussions.

Conclusion:
The appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal directing the AO to allow the claim of the appellant under Section 80IC of the Income Tax Act.

---