TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the transfer of land by the assessee to a partnership firm as capital contribution attracted capital gains tax under section 45(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. (ii) Whether the assessee, being only a partner in the firm, was entitled to deduction under section 80IB(10) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Issue (i): Whether the transfer of land by the assessee to a partnership firm as capital contribution attracted capital gains tax under section 45(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The land was acquired at a cost of Rs. 1.20 crores and was later introduced into the partnership firm at a recorded value of Rs. 6.00 crores. Section 45(3) deems the amount recorded in the books of the firm as the full value of consideration where a capital asset is transferred to a firm by way of capital contribution or otherwise. The reasoning adopted also treated the transaction as covered even where the asset was claimed to be stock-in-trade, because introduction of the asset into the firm was treated as a transfer on the capital account. The cited decision distinguishing cases where the firm itself revalued the asset was held inapplicable on the facts.
Conclusion: The addition of capital gains was upheld and the issue was decided against the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether the assessee, being only a partner in the firm, was entitled to deduction under section 80IB(10) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The deduction under section 80IB(10) is available to an undertaking developing and building a housing project satisfying the prescribed conditions. On the facts found, the assessee was not the undertaking developing the project but only a partner in the firm carrying on the project. The claim for deduction, if otherwise available, belonged to the firm and not to the partner in its individual assessment.
Conclusion: The claim for deduction under section 80IB(10) was rejected and the issue was decided against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The common order sustained the tax addition arising from the land transfer and rejected the assessee's claim for housing-project deduction, resulting in dismissal of all the appeals.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a capital asset or even stock-in-trade is introduced into a firm as capital contribution and its value is recorded in the firm's books, section 45(3) applies to tax the resulting gain; a deduction under section 80IB(10) is available only to the undertaking that develops and builds the housing project and not to a mere partner.
TaxTMI 
