Tribunal allows Cenvat credit for input services in plant setup post-2011

The Tribunal held that input services for setting up a plant/factory post-01.04.2011 qualify for Cenvat credit under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Services directly related to manufacturing activities, including erection and installation, were deemed eligible for credit. The appellant's challenge against the denial of credit was successful, with the impugned order set aside, and the appeal allowed with consequential relief.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Entitlement to Cenvat credit on input services used for setting up of plant/factory after 01.04.2011.
2. Interpretation of Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.

Summary:

1. Entitlement to Cenvat credit on input services used for setting up of plant/factory after 01.04.2011:
The appellant challenged the denial of Cenvat credit on input services used for setting up a plant/factory, arguing that these services are directly related to the manufacture of their final product and thus qualify as input services under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant cited previous Tribunal decisions, including Aditya Aluminium and Jindal Steel & Power Ltd., to support their claim that services used in relation to the manufacture of final products are admissible for credit.

2. Interpretation of Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004:
The Tribunal examined the definition of "input service" post-amendment on 01.04.2011, noting that it includes services used directly or indirectly in or in relation to the manufacture of final products. The Tribunal reiterated that services used for setting up a factory, although omitted from the inclusive part of the definition post-01.04.2011, are still covered under the main clause of the definition. This interpretation is consistent with previous rulings in similar cases, such as Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd. and Bharat Coking Coal Ltd., which held that setting up a factory is an activity directly related to manufacture and thus qualifies for Cenvat credit.

The Tribunal concluded that the input services for erection, commissioning, and installation used in setting up the new plant have a direct nexus with the manufacturing activity, thereby qualifying as input services under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Consequently, the impugned order denying the Cenvat credit was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.

---