TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal revises Transfer Pricing adjustment, directs reassessment on comparables & adjustments</h1> <h3>M/s. Arm Embedded Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Bagmane World Technology Centre, SEZ Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Circle-1 (1) (1) Bangalore</h3> M/s. Arm Embedded Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Bagmane World Technology Centre, SEZ Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Circle-1 (1) (1) Bangalore - TMI Issues Involved:1. Transfer Pricing Adjustment for Marketing and Sales Support Services (MSS)2. Interest on Delayed Receivables3. Comparability of Selected Companies4. Working Capital and Risk Adjustments5. Penalty ProceedingsSummary:1. Transfer Pricing Adjustment for Marketing and Sales Support Services (MSS):The primary issue was the Transfer Pricing (TP) adjustment of Rs. 40,65,217/- made by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) towards the international transactions of MSS provided by the Assessee to its Associated Enterprises (AEs). The Assessee, a subsidiary of Arm Limited, UK, engaged in providing contract software development services (SWD services) and MSS to its AEs, had initially concluded that the international transactions were at arm's length in its TP study. However, the TPO determined a TP adjustment of Rs. 47,39,738/- for the MSS segment. The Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) granted partial relief, reducing the TP adjustment for MSS to Rs. 40,65,217/-. The Tribunal reviewed the comparables selected by the TPO and DRP, and directed the exclusion of certain companies from the final list of comparables due to functional dissimilarities.2. Interest on Delayed Receivables:The TPO had also made an adjustment of Rs. 5,62,08,198/- towards notional interest on delayed receivables. The Assessee argued that the outstanding receivables were settled in the normal course of business and should not be treated as a separate international transaction. The Tribunal referred to previous decisions and directed that interest should be computed using LIBOR rates for credits beyond 60 days, remanding the issue to the AO/TPO for fresh consideration.3. Comparability of Selected Companies:The Assessee contested the inclusion of several companies in the final list of comparables, arguing that they were functionally dissimilar. The Tribunal reviewed the functional profiles of these companies and directed the exclusion of companies such as Scarecrow Communications Ltd., Axience Consulting Pvt. Ltd., Dun & Bradstreet Information Services India Pvt. Ltd., Pressman Advertising Ltd., Lintas India Pvt. Ltd., Majestic Research Service & Solutions Ltd., and Cheil India Pvt. Ltd. due to their dissimilar business activities. The Tribunal also remitted the inclusion of MCI Management India Pvt. Ltd. and Kestone Integrated Marketing Services Pvt. Ltd. to the AO/TPO for fresh consideration.4. Working Capital and Risk Adjustments:The Assessee's grounds related to working capital and risk adjustments were dismissed as not pressed. The Tribunal directed the AO/TPO to compute the correct operating margin as per the DRP's direction.5. Penalty Proceedings:The Assessee challenged the initiation of penalty proceedings under Section 274 read with Section 270A of the Act. The Tribunal found this ground preposterous and dismissed it accordingly.Conclusion:The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the AO/TPO to reconsider certain comparables and adjustments in light of the Tribunal's findings. The order was pronounced in the open court on 8th June, 2023.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
